MiniMax's Legal Setback in Disney Copyright Case

MiniMax's Legal Setback in Disney Copyright Case

Synopsis

A US judge has rejected a bid by Chinese AI firm MiniMax to dismiss a lawsuit. Major studios like Disney and Universal accuse MiniMax of stealing their intellectual property. They claim MiniMax used copyrighted material to train its AI system, Hailuo. The court found the studios' claims plausible.

Listen to this article in summarized format

Walt Disney, Comcast's Universal, and Warner Bros Discovery have fended off a bid from China's MiniMax to dismiss their lawsuit in California federal court over its alleged theft of their intellectual property to build its Hailuo image-and video-generating AI system. US District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld on Friday rejected MiniMax's arguments at an early stage ‌of the ⁠case that ⁠the studios failed to make a valid claim and that the US court lacked jurisdiction over the company.

Spokespeople and attorneys for the companies did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the decision on Tuesday. The studios sued MiniMax last year, alleging it trained Hailuo on their copyrighted material, and used their characters to market Hailuo as a "Hollywood studio in your pocket." ⁠They alleged Hailuo ‌generated images and videos, including characters from the Marvel universe, "Star Wars" movies, and other blockbuster franchises without permission. The case is one ⁠of many filed by major media companies, authors, news outlets, and other copyright holders against tech companies for allegedly using their content without permission to train AI systems. The studios have separately filedsimilar lawsuits against the AI company Midjourney that are ongoing.

MiniMax argued that the California court could not hear the case because the company does all of its business in China. But Blumenfeld said there ‌was evidence that the company was offering the Hailuo app in the United States.

Blumenfeld also rejected MiniMax's argument that ​the studios failed to ​bring a valid ⁠claim, finding the studios' complaint "plainly alleges plausible claims" for copyright infringement.

The case is Disney Enterprises Inc v. MiniMax, US District Court for the Central ​District of California, No. 2:25-cv-08768.

This editorial summary reflects ET Tech and other public reporting on MiniMax's Legal Setback in Disney Copyright Case.

Reviewed by WTGuru editorial team.