By Ross Kerber
June 10 (Reuters) - A shareholder resolution calling on content and technology company Thomson Reuters to review the human rights implications of its work with U.S. immigration authorities won only about 3% support at the firm's annual meeting on Wednesday.
The vote on the resolution, proposed by a British Columbia government workers union, centered on products and services sold to law enforcement by the Toronto-based company that some investors and employees say may help power the Trump administration’s crackdown on undocumented immigrants.
Thomson Reuters had opposed the proposal, and at the meeting its chairman, David Thomson, said "over 95%" had voted against the shareholder measure, while "over 3%" supported it.
"We welcome the outcome of today's vote, which reflects shareholders' confidence in the board's recommendation to vote against the proposal," a Thomson Reuters spokesperson said.
An example of government work cited by supporters of the failed resolution was a $22.8 million contract set to have ended in May with the Department of Homeland Security that in part provided the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency with license plate reader data.
According to federal spending records, that and other contracts were awarded to Thomson Reuters Special Services (TRSS), a unit of Thomson Reuters based in McLean, Virginia. The unit says its products help prevent financial crimes, identify foreign influence and help law enforcement and national security officials analyze data.
The company's Reuters news organization is independent, operating separately from the other parts of Thomson Reuters' business.
One corporate governance expert said the vote showed that Thomson Reuters' biggest investors either felt the measure was unnecessary, or had no appetite for confrontation with the Trump administration over its immigration policies.
"With this vote you have investors not interested in signaling anything" about the company’s work with immigration authorities, said Douglas Chia, president of independent corporate governance firm Soundboard Governance.
One major investor, Norway's sovereign wealth fund, said it voted against the measure because it could not support a proposal "where the company does not appear to have significant gaps in their management or reporting of the relevant sustainability risk."
(Reporting by Ross Kerber; Editing by Daniel Wallis)
